PrefixLookup 0.1.1

There is a newer version of this package available.
See the version list below for details.
dotnet add package PrefixLookup --version 0.1.1
NuGet\Install-Package PrefixLookup -Version 0.1.1
This command is intended to be used within the Package Manager Console in Visual Studio, as it uses the NuGet module's version of Install-Package.
<PackageReference Include="PrefixLookup" Version="0.1.1" />
For projects that support PackageReference, copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package.
paket add PrefixLookup --version 0.1.1
#r "nuget: PrefixLookup, 0.1.1"
#r directive can be used in F# Interactive and Polyglot Notebooks. Copy this into the interactive tool or source code of the script to reference the package.
// Install PrefixLookup as a Cake Addin
#addin nuget:?package=PrefixLookup&version=0.1.1

// Install PrefixLookup as a Cake Tool
#tool nuget:?package=PrefixLookup&version=0.1.1

Version

Prefix Lookup and the TrieHard Project

Hi! I'm keithwill. I'm a C# dev that has been in the industry for a while, and while working on an open source project I realized I needed an industrial grade prefix search collection. There doesn't appear to be one in the .NET class library, and after surveying the libraries available on Nuget and GitHub, I realized that there are very few libraries available for this purpose that have been kept updated, that are complete and functional, and that perform well.

This repository is a playground for testing various implementations of structures and approaches for performing prefix (starts with) searches, like the kind used for autocomplete or typeahead functionality.

I will gladly take contributions to this project and I plan to expose some of its results as Nuget packages for general use.

What is with the name? What is a Trie?

A Trie is a data structure that was developed for performing prefix searches on text and has been around for a while. It is a commonly recommended data structure for this requirement, and it has many variations.

A basic trie isn't too hard to understand. In C# terms, it can be thought of as a hierarchical collection. Each object in the trie is a node and the trie starts with a single 'root' node. Each node has a key character and references to its children and optionally a payload value. The root node does not typically have a key character. There is a small amount of space saving since the entire keys are not stored in each node, only a single character.

To do a prefix search using a trie, the children of the root node are iterated to see if one has a matching key character to the first character in the prefix search string. If so, repeat the search with THAT child node and try to match it on the second character of the search string. If you don't find matches for all of the characters in the search string then there were no matches in the trie for that prefix. If you found matches for all of the characters in the search string, then that node and all of its children (recursively) are the search results that match the search.

Searching for a key is done the same way. The only difference is that the entire search string must be matched and the children of the matches are not considered. Accumulating results in an efficient way can be tricky. The most common approaches of recursion or using collections to build the results can perform poorly in C# (due to our lack of tail call optimization) or generate excessive garbage.

Radix Tree

A radix tree is a variant of a trie where some nodes are merged together. If a node has a child and that child doesn't have any children of its own, then it can be merged with its parent. Instead of storing a character, each node in the tree can contain a string. For example, if a radix tree contained only the keys 'alternate' and 'alter', it would have three nodes: the root node, a child with a key of 'alter' and it would have a single child of 'nate'. Later, if 'alt' was stored, then there would be nodes of 'alt', 'ter' and 'nate'. When insertions and removals are done from the graph, nodes are merged and split as needed.

This allows fewer nodes to be created and maintained, but requires more complicated logic for inserts and removals from the tree and requires string processing at each node which sometimes requires special consideration in C#.

Other Trie Variants

Many of the other trie variants utilize approaches to further compact the keys. This makes them perform well and require less storage when checking if a key exists, but makes them ill suited for searching by prefix. Some variants are the HAMT, the hash tree, and the patricia trie. The first two act more like dictionaries than a trie (as the keys are hashed). I have found conflicting information on the patricia trie, but as described in its original paper it does not store whole keys and can only be used to check for the existence of complete matches.

Typical Alternatives to Tries

The most common alternative for implementing a prefix lookup is a naive enumeration over a list. Typically this could be done with a LINQ Where query passing in a lambda to check if each key element StartsWith a given search text. This can perform well for smaller collections, but quickly becomes a hindrance with millions of items.

Database queries using a 'LIKE' clause are also quite common. While the latency can be quite bad compared to an in-memory collection and depends on networking stability, it usually has an advantage of simplifying concurrency concerns and ensuring the client always has access to the most recent data. For smaller projects its not uncommon for instances to contain a local database file to cache lookups (such as SQLite).

Another option is to use a dedicated text searching tool or system, such as ElasticSearch. These can perform well and can provide advanced searching capabilities (such as transforming the search text and analyzing it before searching, as well as fuzzy matches), but they can be quite complicated to properly setup and maintain, and still induce additional latency and networking concerns.

What's Currently Included In This Project

In TrieHard.Abstractions is an interface IPrefixLookup. All implementations in this project implement that interface. An IPrefixLookup has an indexer and can be enumerated for key value pairs like a Dictionary, but also exposes Search and SearchValues methods which take a key prefix and return enumerables of KeyValuePairs or the generic value results respectively.

SimpleTrie

This was implemented as a reference C# trie based on various articles that suggest using Dictionaries at each node to store keys and children. A number of nuget packages can be found that implement a similar approach.

RadixTree

This is similar to a trie, but key values that don't branch can be combined. When keys are longer and highly unique, then this approach can perform well. This particular implementation was tuned to reduce recursion and can can be modified by a single thread while reads are going on concurrently. It is not an immutable trie though, and if changes are performed while readers are enumerating, they will see values that may have been modified after they started enumerating.

Indirect Trie

This trie uses readonly structs stored in arrays to represent nodes. The structs do not directly reference each other, instead referencing bucket and array index locations where connected nodes are stored instead. Nodes only store links to their parent, their first child and to their first in-order sibling. It has similar concurrency characteristics to the RadixTree.

Compact Trie

This Trie uses unmanaged memory as storage for nodes and utilizes Spans and inline arrays to reduce allocations during operations. It offers a few specialized APIs beyond the IPrefixLookup methods, such as a non allocation search operation that gives access to keys as UTF8 spans.

The string keys are converted to UTF8 bytes before they are stored and when retrieved. Performance is better when using the UTF8 specific search methods (not shared by the other implementations) or when retrieving values.

rm.Trie

I found this library on nuget/github. It was one of the few trie libraries that had a reasonable number of downloads, was up to date, and contained functional code. An IPrefixLookup wrapper was implemented to include it as a comparison.

ListPrefixLookup (NaiveList)

Many devs will use LINQ on a List/Array to perform a StartsWith search to implement an autocomplete instead of using a specialized collection. This performs well for small lists, but can become a hindrance as the size increases. Lists are also not thread safe, which makes modifying them at runtime awkward.

SQLiteLookup

SQLite is a very common single file database and is often used within applications to store read-heavy data. Using a database is a common way to query data such as for an autocomplete or typeahead. Included is an IPrefixLookup wrapper that creates an in-memory SQLite connection and creates a table to contain keys and value indexes.

Searches are done using SQL queries. A real database would likely perform worse (involving networking and data retrieval). An advantage of this approach is that the queries involved are simple, and SQLite will handle concurrency issues for the developer (though it does not perform well when undergoing sustained concurrent write pressure). I don't recommend reusing this SQLiteLookup, as its not intended for use outside of these contrived benchmarks and it wasn't made to support updates.

Nuget Package PrefixLookup

Also included is a project for building a Nuget package. Currently this utilizes a wrapper around the CompactTrie implementation. This package should be considered experimental at this time and plans are to target the most recent LTS of .NET

Benchmarks

Benchmarks are contained in TrieHard.Benchmarks. Most of the tests are contained in the LookupBenchmark.cs, but there are a few tests in CompatBench.cs which are specific to the CompactTrie.

Creating a lookup with a million sequential entries (strings for keys and values)

dotnet run -c Release --filter *Create*

| Type      | Method | Mean     | Error    | StdDev   | Gen0   | Gen1   | Gen2   | Allocated  |
|---------- |------- |---------:|---------:|---------:|-------:|-------:|-------:|-----------:|
| Simple    | Create | 153.4 us |  9.03 us |  0.49 us | 3.4180 | 1.2207 |      - |  569.18 KB |
| Radix     | Create | 193.0 us |  9.21 us |  1.43 us | 2.4414 | 0.4883 |      - |  417.63 KB |
| Compact   | Create | 238.4 us | 14.51 us |  5.17 us | 0.4883 |      - |      - |   80.87 KB |
| Indirect  | Create | 307.1 us | 22.58 us | 11.81 us | 1.4648 | 1.4648 | 1.4648 |  468.88 KB |
| NaiveList | Create | 370.0 us | 20.65 us |  1.13 us |      - |      - |      - |   43.35 KB |
| rmTrie    | Create | 446.1 us | 16.12 us |  2.49 us | 6.8359 | 2.4414 |      - | 1097.82 KB |
| SQLite    | Create | 935.2 us | 44.28 us |  2.43 us | 1.9531 |      - |      - |  381.76 KB |

Getting a value by key

dotnet run -c Release --filter *Get*

| Type      | Method   | Mean            | Error          | StdDev        | Gen0   | Allocated |
|---------- |--------- |----------------:|---------------:|--------------:|-------:|----------:|
| Compact   | Get      |        29.66 ns |       1.060 ns |      0.058 ns |      - |         - |
| Radix     | Get      |        30.13 ns |       1.712 ns |      0.265 ns |      - |         - |
| Simple    | Get      |        32.94 ns |       0.875 ns |      0.048 ns |      - |         - |
| rmTrie    | Get      |        35.13 ns |       0.490 ns |      0.027 ns |      - |         - |
| Indirect  | Get      |        84.71 ns |       0.812 ns |      0.044 ns |      - |         - |
| SQLite    | Get      |       832.92 ns |      32.031 ns |      4.957 ns | 0.0019 |     416 B |
| NaiveList | Get      | 8,030,960.16 ns | 610,192.498 ns | 33,446.710 ns |      - |     189 B |

A plain list struggles a bit at one million records.

Setting a value by key

dotnet run -c Release --filter *Set*

| Type      | Method | Mean            | Error         | StdDev       | Allocated |
|---------- |------- |----------------:|--------------:|-------------:|----------:|
| Compact   | Set    |        34.72 ns |      1.022 ns |     0.056 ns |         - |
| Radix     | Set    |        38.15 ns |      0.963 ns |     0.053 ns |         - |
| rmTrie    | Set    |        41.82 ns |      1.998 ns |     0.110 ns |         - |
| Simple    | Set    |        50.84 ns |      0.474 ns |     0.026 ns |         - |
| Indirect  | Set    |       189.52 ns |      1.363 ns |     0.075 ns |         - |
| NaiveList | Set    | 1,386,196.61 ns | 40,324.607 ns | 2,210.328 ns |      13 B |

Searching Key Value Pairs by prefix (100 results enumerated)

dotnet run -c Release --filter *SearchKVP*

| Type      | Method    | Mean            | Error           | StdDev        | Gen0   | Allocated |
|---------- |---------- |----------------:|----------------:|--------------:|-------:|----------:|
| Radix     | SearchKVP |        434.0 ns |        17.03 ns |       0.93 ns | 0.0029 |     496 B |
| Indirect  | SearchKVP |        478.8 ns |         9.61 ns |       0.53 ns | 0.0029 |     544 B |
| Simple    | SearchKVP |        837.8 ns |        36.14 ns |       5.59 ns | 0.0124 |    2120 B |
| rmTrie    | SearchKVP |      1,269.4 ns |        69.62 ns |       3.82 ns | 0.0153 |    2496 B |
| Compact   | SearchKVP |      1,620.1 ns |       109.85 ns |      65.37 ns | 0.0038 |     696 B |
| NaiveList | SearchKVP | 14,945,116.1 ns | 1,004,783.84 ns |  55,075.59 ns |      - |     378 B |
| SQLite    | SearchKVP | 33,577,520.0 ns | 1,675,232.52 ns | 259,244.09 ns |      - |    1368 B |

Searching Values by prefix (100 results enumerated)

dotnet run -c Release --filter *SearchValues*

| Type      | Method            | Mean            | Error           | StdDev       | Gen0   | Allocated |
|---------- |------------------ |----------------:|----------------:|-------------:|-------:|----------:|
| Compact   | SearchValues      |        540.4 ns |        21.30 ns |      3.30 ns | 0.0010 |     176 B |
| Radix     | SearchValues      |        559.3 ns |        41.35 ns |      2.27 ns | 0.0029 |     560 B |
| Indirect  | SearchValues      |        568.2 ns |        34.20 ns |      1.87 ns | 0.0029 |     528 B |
| Simple    | SearchValues      |        919.1 ns |        25.41 ns |      3.93 ns | 0.0134 |    2184 B |
| rmTrie    | SearchValues      |      1,039.2 ns |        33.74 ns |      1.85 ns | 0.0114 |    1968 B |
| NaiveList | SearchValues      | 15,526,997.4 ns |   729,173.19 ns | 39,968.44 ns |      - |     466 B |
| SQLite    | SearchValues      | 33,621,077.8 ns | 1,386,184.98 ns | 75,981.48 ns |      - |     928 B |

Compact additional APIs

dotnet run -c Release --filter *Compact*

| Method            | Mean            | Error          | StdDev      | Gen0   | Allocated |
|------------------ |----------------:|---------------:|------------:|-------:|----------:|
| Get_Utf8          |      23.5229 ns |      0.4000 ns |   0.0219 ns |      - |         - |
| SearchSpans       |     327.7641 ns |      7.8114 ns |   0.4282 ns |      - |         - |
| SearchValues_Utf8 |     439.9298 ns |     19.6796 ns |   1.0787 ns |      - |         - |

These methods require searching with UTF8 byte data. The SearchSpans method returns an enumerator which only has access to the key for the duration of the loop body and will cause boxing if used with any LINQ operations (or anything casting the result to IEnumerable). It avoids the cost and garbage collection of converting the keys back to strings, but has much more limited utility since a consumer has to use the search results in a narrow scope.

Working set to create one million sequential entries

| Method            | Working Set MiB |
|------------------ |----------------:|
| Baseline          |       93.15 MiB |
| Compact           |      132.00 MiB |
| Naive List        |      135.87 MiB |
| Indirect          |      139.03 MiB |
| SQLite            |      141.62 MiB |
| Radix             |      214.34 MiB |
| Simple            |      289.73 MiB |
| rmTrie            |      290.02 MiB |

Baseline in this case means creating one million key value pairs without putting them into one of the lookups. This last 'benchmark' is meant to be illustrative, it is not a formal benchmark. It was done using a console application and the Visual Studio performance profiler.

To properly compare the memory characteristics of the various implementations would require testing more key and payload types (particularly value type payloads), as well as utilizing keys that would exhibit various levels of branching (e.g. sequential vs random words vs highly random like GUIDs).

Product Compatible and additional computed target framework versions.
.NET net8.0 is compatible.  net8.0-android was computed.  net8.0-browser was computed.  net8.0-ios was computed.  net8.0-maccatalyst was computed.  net8.0-macos was computed.  net8.0-tvos was computed.  net8.0-windows was computed. 
Compatible target framework(s)
Included target framework(s) (in package)
Learn more about Target Frameworks and .NET Standard.
  • net8.0

    • No dependencies.

NuGet packages

This package is not used by any NuGet packages.

GitHub repositories

This package is not used by any popular GitHub repositories.

Version Downloads Last updated
0.1.8 258 10/24/2023
0.1.7 128 10/9/2023
0.1.6 114 10/3/2023
0.1.5 121 10/1/2023
0.1.4 96 9/26/2023
0.1.3 136 9/26/2023
0.1.2 134 9/23/2023
0.1.1 114 9/19/2023
0.1.0 113 9/19/2023