Garyon 0.1.1

Garyon

A C# library aiming to offer multi-dimensional functionality.

Why is it here?

Many parts of the standard library are either incomplete or not as well-designed. This library offers further helpers and overall functionality with its code, preventing the user from needing to write commonly found boilerplate code for frequent tasks. Many projects include some utility code that could serve general purpose, and is being reimplemented on a per-project basis, which should not happen. Furthermore, a lot of the boilerplate code is not even nearly as optimized as it could be, while in some projects that need performance, optimizations are either mediocre, or just too in-depth, consuming useful time from actually developing the intended project.

What areas does it cover?

From System.Console to System.Reflection, or even custom implementations of common assets, this library can expand virtually every single area the standard library does not fully cover.

Contribution

Abide to the code style, ensure all additions are properly tested, and include test cases. More information is specifically given under the Quality Control section:

Quality Control

This library aims to offer high-performance utility code, thus everything needs to be properly tested and benchmarked to ensure that it does have a significant improvement over other solutions. This is why the solution contains the

Garyon.QualityControl
Garyon.Benchmarks
Garyon.Tests

projects.

• Garyon.QualityControl is the base project, which the other two depend on. It is meant to contain shared assets between tests and benchmarks.
• Garyon.Benchmarks contains the benchmarks that are being run in order to test performance of the functionality that is being provided.
• Garyon.Tests contains test cases for each single non-obviously correct function to ensure the utilities are correctly implemented in every case. Every single test must cover all edge cases, to never come across potential regressions.

Performance

To ensure performance is peak, SIMD must be taken into consideration. There are numerous instructions that fall under that category, and offer great performance improvements when used in an impactful amount. Repetitive calls to small functions should be inlined, whereas much less frequently used functions need not be inlined, neither optimized, for long as they do not completely ruin performance.